Painting of the Battle Of Tours |
Coming in at number 10 on my list we have the Battle of Tours, a Battle in Southern France that repelled the Islamic armies from what would become the Kingdom of France and paved the way for the establishment of the Carolingian dynasty who would reshape Post-Roman western Europe. If you notice in the painting Charles is defending a mother and child in an over the top and completely inaccurate portrayal of anything that happened at the battle.
Background: In 634 A.D armies of the new
religion of Islam attacked the Sassanid and Byzantine Empires who just completed a long
and intense war that had drained both empires leaving them easy prey for the
forces of Islam. By 720 the Islamic Caliphate stretched from modern India all the
way through North Africa and to southern France. The Umayyad Caliphate had invaded Iberia(Modern Spain) in 711 and by 718 they were in control of most of the Iberian Peninsula and
began pushing into the Duchy of Aquitaine, which is in modern day southern France
and at the time was still referred to as Gaul. The Duchy of Aquitaine was led
by Duke Odo who inflicted the first major defeat on the Umayyad’s Dynasty on
June 9, 721 at the Battle of Toulouse and Odo was declared a Champion of Christianity
by the Pope. However the Merovingian dynasty ruled in Gaul with the title of
King of the Franks and had fallen into Civil War after the death of
Pepin of Herstal and Duke Odo had declared his independence. So at this point Odo
is under attack from both the Umayyad’s and the Franks and so he marries his
daughter to a Muslim lord, despite Odo being a “Champion of Christianity”. Things went poorly for Odo after this, Emir Uthman ibn Naissa whom he had married his daughter to rebelled against the Umayyad's and
Odo’s forces were soundly defeated by an Umayyad army who then looked to push
further into Gaul. Odo appealed to Charles Martel, who was fighting for a claim as King of the Franks, and agreed to submit to his authority if he would help him.
The Battle: Now it’s important to understand that
despite being called the Battle of Tours, nobody actually knows exactly where
this battle took place, but most believe it was between the cities of Tours and
Poitiers. We also do not know exactly how many soldiers were on either side,
sources claim that the number of Christian troops was between 15,000 and 80,000
and the Muslim forces have been stated at between 10,000 and 80,000. Charles
Martell had picked the battle field and wanted the Muslim army under Abd
el-Rahman to attack him as he held his force in a phalanx type formation to try
and repel the Muslim heavy Cavalry. It is of note that despite the later adoption of the armored Knight into warfare, at this point Europeans had none as
they had not developed the stirrup which would allow them to travel on Horse
with heavy armor, the Muslim forces did have these armored knights with lances
and swords which they had come to rely upon. Also historians have wondered why
Rahman proceeds with so little scouting into the area and it is generally
concluded that he either did not view the Franks as a threat or did not believe
that they would come to Odo’s aid. During the battle the Muslim heavy cavalry
repeatedly charged the tightly grouped Frankish troops and were repulsed again
and again, however this tactic may have eventually worked if not for one of
those odd moments in history that shaped future world events. Charles Martel supposedly
sent scouts to raid the Muslim army’s camp in
hopes of causing chaos, but what happened went beyond his wildest dreams. The
Muslim army, just like any other invading army, had accumulated large amounts
of plunder and when word reached the men at the front that their plunder was
being seized, some ran back to the camp to stop these raiders from seizing the
new wealth that they had accumulated. But quickly more and more troops began to
do this and it soon turned into a retreat and then the Muslim army routed. It is
important to remember that during hand to hand combat like this there are not
that many casualties during the actual battle, but when one side runs away that
is when the body count starts to really accumulate. During the chaos General Abd
el-Rahman tried to stop the retreat but was surrounded and killed and the
Muslim army retreated. The Franks did not know the battle was over and they
expected that the next day the battle would resume, but the Muslim army
withdrew to the Iberian Peninsula, Charles was victorious and was given the
name Charles Martel, which means the Hammer.
Aftermath: Charles the Hammer’s son was Pippin
the Short who would become the first Carolingian King of the Franks and his son
was Charlemagne would go on to dramatically alter the face of Post- Roman Europe. Charlemagne
would establish the Holy Roman Empire, conquer and convert the Saxons and would
subdue the Lombard’s in Italy.
Importance: Now there is a very large debate
over whether this is an important battle in History and that is the main reason
why I have it so low at number 10. The debate at times seems to follow an east
and west divide, many Christian scholars believe that this saves Christianity, while many Muslim
Scholars believe that the battle was insignificant because the Umayyad’s had
already pushed as far as they were going to push into Western Europe. However the reluctance of Muslim scholar’s to admit any defeat has to be accounted for. In reference to Tours an Arabian chronicler wrote:
Musa being returned to Damascus, the Caliph Abd-el Melek
asked of him about his conquests, saying "Now tell me about these
Franks---what is their nature?"
"They," replied Musa, "are a folk right
numerous, and full of might: brave and impetuous in the attack, but cowardly
and craven in event of defeat."
"And how has passed the war betwixt them and thyself?
Favorably or the reverse?"
"The reverse? No, by Allah and the prophet!" spoke
Musa. "Never has a company from my army been beaten. And never have the Moslems
hesitated to follow me when I have led them; though they were twoscore to
fourscore."
Islamic
armies had been victorious everywhere and so many attempted to paint Tours as a
minor defeat, but downplaying the importance and scale of ones defeats or
painting them as heroic stands against impossible odds is a very common throughout
history. The reality of it, in my own humble opinion, truly lies in the middle
of these ideas, Christian Europe was not likely to be destroyed with a loss as
Tours but the Christian states warring with one another they could have pressed
the weak states in Southern Gaul and Northern Italy. However the Islamic
Caliphate had overextended itself and would soon fall into warring with one another
over succession, while it is possible that they could have pushed into Gaul and
Italy the ability to hold these areas may have proven difficult. It is also possible that even if they had
secured more of Western Europe that it may not have had a major impact on the
area, after all Muslim forces controlled various portions of Italy and raided Southern
France for several centuries after Tours. However you never truly know what may
have happened, what if a Muslim kingdom had been established in Southern Gaul?
What if France is never established as a true Kingdom?
The biggest
thing that really comes out of the battle of Tours is the rise of the
Carolingian Dynasty and what Charles Martel’s grandson Charlemagne does for
Europe. Without Charlemagne and the Carolingian dynasty Europe could have
looked very different and all of this is brought on by Charles the Hammer’s
victory at Tours. If Charles loses or is even killed at Tours then it is very
likely that his son Pippin the Short cannot depose Childeric III of
the Merovingian dynasty and become King of the Franks. The possibilities are endless which
is why the battle becomes so important even if it is unlikely that it saved
Europe from Islamic conquest.
Conclusion: So in the end Tours comes in at
number ten because it allows the Carolingians and Charlemagne to rise to power more
than because of it supposed saving of Christendom from the armies of the
prophet Muhammad. Could a victory at Tours led to a Muslim takeover of Southern
and possibly all of Gaul? Yes but it is also possible that nothing significant
would have come out of it and any gains by Abd el-Rahman would have been
temporary as the Franks would have eventually pushed his army out of Gaul.
No comments:
Post a Comment